Annual basis: two numbers for the same boundary
An annual basis quotes a monthly figure that requires a year's commitment. Pages in this register mix that convention with plain monthly pricing, so two crossing points are rarely comparable as printed. As of 2026-09-22.
| The term | Annual basis |
|---|---|
| What it names | A monthly figure conditional on a year's commitment |
| What it is not | The amount charged in any single month |
| Where the register uses it | The prose of several paid-tier readings |
Inclusion rule. Words this site uses in a narrow sense, where the ordinary sense would lead a reader to misread a cell. No vendor statement appears on this page. Order. Fixed order: what the word names, what it excludes, then where it is used here.
1The same boundary, two headline figures
Four entries here print both conventions for the plan where the mark stops. The gaps range from modest to about a third of the monthly figure, which is wide enough that two entries with the same monthly price can look like different boundaries depending on which number a reader picked up.
Nothing about the file changes with the billing cycle. The mark comes off on the plan, so the cheaper annual figure buys exactly the state the dearer monthly one buys. What differs is the commitment, and therefore the cost of having chosen the wrong plan.
2Where the commitment actually costs something
On one entry a watermark applied before an upgrade is stated to survive it. Committing annually to the plan below that crossing point means a year of material that no later payment can clean up, which is a larger consequence than the discount is worth.
Everywhere else the commitment is only money. A reader who chose the wrong plan pays for the rest of the term and gets clean output from the moment they upgrade, because on those entries the crossing point applies to whatever is generated next.
3What the register does with the two figures
The cell holds whichever figure the page prints as the plan's headline price; the reading records the other. Neither is converted, averaged or annualised, because the columns are meant to hold what a vendor published rather than a calculation performed here.
The consequence is that any comparison across entries has to name its basis. A finding page that quotes a range of crossing points is quoting a range of headline figures, which is stated on that page rather than left for a reader to discover.
Nothing on this page is a vendor statement; the values it helps read are on the support table, with the page and the date each one was read from. See also the paid tier column, reading a plan table. Nearby terms: promotional rate, plan inheritance, trial tier.