D-ID's trial carries a full-screen watermark
D-ID's pricing page says a full-screen watermark appears for trial users, and gives a reason: transparency about the synthetic nature of the videos users generate. As of 2026-09-22.
| The reading | What it holds |
|---|---|
| The recorded value | Full-screen watermark on the trial |
| The vendor's own words | A full-screen watermark appears for trial users. |
| How the reading was taken | Read from a sentence on the pricing page, printed alongside a stated reason for the mark. |
Inclusion rule. One row for the value, one for the sentence or absence behind it, one for the method. Nothing here is drawn from output, support replies or coverage by anyone else. Order. Fixed order: the value, then its evidence, then the method.
| Generator | Free tier |
|---|---|
| D-ID | Full-screen watermark on the trial |
| Fliki | Includes Fliki watermark |
| Kling AI | Brand watermark on output |
| Luma AI | Watermark, not lifted by a later upgrade |
Inclusion rule. Generators whose own pages carry a sentence about free-plan output, rather than leaving the answer to be inferred from a line printed against the paid columns. Order. Alphabetical by generator name.
1Full-screen is a geometry, and no other row states one
Every other visible mark in this register is either unnamed or localised to a corner. Full-screen is a different object: it covers the picture rather than occupying part of it, which makes the output unusable as footage rather than merely branded. A crop does not help, because there is nothing outside the mark to keep.
That turns the trial into a demonstration rather than a source of material. The distinction matters when reading this column across the register, because on several other rows free output is marked and still perfectly usable, and a reader comparing cells that both say watermark would conclude those rows are equivalent.
2A reason, printed where reasons usually are not
Pricing pages exist to sell plans, and a justification for a limitation is not obviously sales copy. This one prints it anyway: the mark is there so that there is transparency about the synthetic nature of the videos users generate. Two vendors in this register publish a reason beside a marking decision, and only one of them does it on a commercial page.
A stated reason is worth a row because it predicts the shape of future changes. A mark justified by disclosure has an argument for surviving a repackaging; a mark justified by nothing at all moves whenever the grid does. The register cannot audit the reason and can record that one was offered.
3The reason stops where the paid plans begin
The same page says videos carry the mark on the Trial and Lite plans, so the first paid plan is still marked and the mark disappears one tier higher. Read next to the transparency argument, that is an interesting seam: the disclosure rationale applies to two plans and is not extended to the ones above them.
The register records the boundary and not the tension, because the tension is an editorial observation rather than a published statement. What the cells carry is that the trial is marked, that Lite is marked, and that the pages offer a reason covering both.
4Sources
- Free tierA full-screen watermark appears for trial usersstated outright
- RationaleThe pricing page gives a reason for the mark: that there is transparency about the synthetic nature of the videos users generatepublished beside the mark
The value above is read from d-id.com, the vendor's pricing page, on 2026-09-22. The whole row for this generator is on its own page, and the rule for what this column may hold is on the free tier column page. Neighbouring readings: Pictory, no free plan, Kling AI, paid tier.