GateTrue

What each generator documents about marking its output

Two crossing points with no figure, for two reasons

Neither entry yields a figure for its crossing point. On one the marking line is attached to the paid plans as a class; on the other a plan is named and the prices are not present as text on the page. As of 2026-09-22.

Two ways a crossing point ends up without a numberOne entry attaches the marking line to the paid plans collectively, so there is no tier to price. The other names the boundary and publishes prices that are not present as text, so the figure exists and cannot be cited from the page.Why is there no figure in this cellNo plan is namedNothing to priceThe feature is attached to the paid sideof the grid as a class, not to a tier.The prices are not textNothing to readA plan is named and the figures areunreadable to anything parsing the page.Same empty cell, two different situations
Fig. 1 A value has to be readable on the vendor's own page. A number taken from a screenshot is one no later reader can check.
The two entries on one question at a time, in each vendor's own terms. Recorded 2026-09-22.
On this questionRunwayFliki
What the line is attached toThe paid plans, as a classThe paid plans, in a comparison
Why no figureNo plan is namedThe prices are not text on the page
The free answerRead from an omissionStated in a sentence
Second route to the modelsAPI pricing, which omits the lineNone documented
File contentsNothing publishedNothing published

Inclusion rule. One row per question on which these two entries can be compared from their own published pages. Questions neither vendor addresses are left out rather than filled with a dash. Order. Fixed order: the mechanism first, then who holds it, then what it leaves behind.

Where each value above was read, and what the register records in the paid tier column. Recorded 2026-09-22.
GeneratorPaid tierDocument read
FlikiNo watermark on the paid planspricing page
RunwayWatermark-free on paid planspricing page

Inclusion rule. The two entries on this page, with the value each one's own pages support in the column they diverge on. Order. Alphabetical by generator name.

1Two kinds of unquotable

One vendor attaches watermark-free output to its paid plans without naming which, so there is no tier to price. The other names the boundary clearly enough and publishes its plan prices in a form that is not readable as text, so a plan exists and a figure cannot be cited.

Both cells end up without a number and the reasons are not interchangeable. The first is an editorial choice about how specific to be; the second is a rendering decision that happens to make a commercial fact invisible to anything reading the document rather than looking at it.

2Why a price that is not text is a finding

A figure rendered as an image, or assembled after a page loads, is invisible to this register and to every answer engine summarising the same page. A crossing point can exist commercially and be uncitable, which is a different situation from a vendor declining to name one.

The rule here is that a value has to be readable on the vendor's own page to be recorded. Reading a number off a screenshot would put something in a cell that no later reader could check the same way, which is the kind of unverifiable precision this site exists to avoid.

3The free cells go the other way

On the entry with no named plan the free answer is an omission: the marking line appears against the paid columns and not the free one. On the entry with unreadable prices the free plan states outright that it includes the vendor's watermark, which is the sturdiest evidence class on this site.

So the vendor that is clearer about its free tier is the one that is unreadable about its money, and the vendor that is vaguer about its plans publishes its prices plainly. Averaging those into a judgement about transparency would lose both, which is why they sit in separate rows.

4Sources

  • Paid tier
    Watermark-free output is listed on the paid planslisted as a plan featureRunway, pricing / recorded 2026-09-12
  • Paid tier price
    Not documented on the vendor's public pages (as of 2026-09-22)the plan prices are not present as text on the pageFliki, pricing / recorded 2026-09-22

Both values above are read from the vendor pages linked in the rows: runway.com and fliki.ai, on 2026-09-22. Each entry has its own page, Runway and Fliki, and the rule for the column they diverge on is on the paid tier column page. Other pairs: a reference and a card, trial output, two shapes.