What the pages say about files already generated
One entry states what happens to files generated before an upgrade: the watermark stays on them. Every other entry describes what a plan produces from now on and leaves earlier material unmentioned. As of 2026-09-22.
| Generator | Free tier | Document read |
|---|---|---|
| Luma AI | Watermark, not lifted by a later upgrade | licensing guide |
| SceneMixer | Visible watermark, on by default | compliance guide |
Inclusion rule. Entries whose pages say something about the standing of files generated before a change of plan or setting, rather than only about what a plan produces next. Order. Alphabetical by generator name.
1A question a pricing grid has no grammar for
A plan grid describes what a column buys going forward. Nothing in that structure can speak about material that already exists, so a reader wanting to know whether an upgrade cleans up last week's output is reading the wrong genre of page. Licensing terms can answer it, because their subject is the standing of things.
One entry does. Content generated on its free or entry plan carries a watermark which, the guide says, cannot be removed even if the subscription is upgraded later. The same paragraph runs the rule backwards: files made while a subscription was active are not described as changing when it lapses.
2Why silence is not the same as permission
On the other entries the register records nothing in either direction, because nothing is published. A reader planning to trial on a free plan and upgrade before delivery is relying on an absence, which is weaker than relying on a sentence and easier to mistake for good news.
The nearest thing to a second data point is a compliance guide that warns publishers re-encoding can strip whatever metadata the tool writes. That is a statement about handling rather than about plans, and it points the same way: what happens to a file after it exists is mostly undocumented across this subject.
3What it costs when the answer is no
Regenerating is not re-exporting. A generative model asked the same question twice returns two different files, so the clean version of an approved shot is a new shot that has to be approved again, at whatever the plan now costs and with whatever variation the model introduces.
So on the one entry that answers this question, the decision about which plan to use is a decision about the material rather than about the invoice, and it has to be taken before the work. That is a scheduling constraint no column in this register was designed to hold, which is why it is recorded as a separate fact.
4Sources
- ControlAfter a cancellation or downgrade, new generations fall under the Free plan terms and may include a watermark, while earlier Free and Lite output keeps its watermarktied to the state of the subscription
- Paid tierContent generated under the Plus, Unlimited and Enterprise plans carries commercial usage rights with no watermarkfrom Plus upward
- MetadataThe guide tells publishers to keep whatever content credentials or generation metadata the tool writes, and warns that re-encoding can strip themdescribed but not enumerated
Every row above is read from the vendor page named beside it, on 2026-09-22. The same values in register form are on the support table, the rule for this column is on the free tier column page, and what may fill a cell at all is on the what earns a row page. Other findings: three kinds of empty cell, which columns a row fills.