A watermark named, and a grid that avoids the word
One grid lists the vendor's watermark among the things its free plan includes. The other never prints the word at all and offers instead to remove a logo from the paid plans upward. As of 2026-09-22.
| On this question | Fliki | Synthesia |
|---|---|---|
| The word used | The vendor's own watermark | The vendor's logo |
| Free plan | States the mark as an inclusion | The removal line is simply absent |
| Evidence class | Stated in a sentence | Carried by layout |
| Found by a term search | Yes | No |
| Crossing point figure | Not present as text | Twenty-nine a month, eighteen yearly |
Inclusion rule. One row per question on which these two entries can be compared from their own published pages. Questions neither vendor addresses are left out rather than filled with a dash. Order. Fixed order: the mechanism first, then who holds it, then what it leaves behind.
| Generator | Free tier | Document read |
|---|---|---|
| Fliki | Includes Fliki watermark | pricing page |
| Synthesia | Logo removal not listed on Basic | pricing page |
Inclusion rule. The two entries on this page, with the value each one's own pages support in the column they diverge on. Order. Alphabetical by generator name.
1An inclusion and an absence, for the same arrangement
Both products mark free output and remove the mark on paid plans. One says so by printing the watermark in the free plan's own inventory of what it includes; the other says so by leaving a removal line off the free column. Identical behaviour, opposite grammar, and two different evidence classes.
Only the first survives a redesign. A clause in a feature list is either still printed or visibly gone; an absent line can vanish or reappear for reasons that have nothing to do with the product, so that reading has to be redone every time the grid moves.
2A word that decides whether a page is findable
One grid never uses the word watermark. The mark is the vendor's brand plus the word logo, and the paid feature is the removal of it. A question phrased with the standard term does not match the page, so a vendor documenting this behaviour is absent from answers about it.
The other names its own brand too, calling the mark the vendor's watermark, but keeps the category word. That is enough: the brand narrows the description and the category makes it retrievable. The register records the vendor's noun in both cases and keeps the substitution as a separate fact on the row where it happens.
3Where each page becomes unreadable
The candid free plan sits on a page whose plan prices are not present as text, so its crossing point can be named and not quoted. The grid that avoids the word prints two figures for its entry tier, twenty-nine monthly and eighteen billed yearly, the widest annual spread on any priced row here.
Both record not documented for file contents. Two pricing grids, two vocabularies, two evidence classes, and the same silence about what either file carries once the mark has been removed by the arrangement each page sells.
4Sources
- Free tierThe free plan's feature list states that it includes the Fliki watermarkstated outright
- VocabularyThe mark is named only as the Synthesia logo; the plan features carry no line using the word watermarkthe vendor's own term for the mark
Both values above are read from the vendor pages linked in the rows: fliki.ai and synthesia.io, on 2026-09-22. Each entry has its own page, Fliki and Synthesia, and the rule for the column they diverge on is on the free tier column page. Other pairs: two routes, one model, a switch and a benefit.