GateTrue

What each generator documents about marking its output

D-ID's first paid plan is still marked

D-ID's pricing page says videos carry a D-ID watermark on the Trial and Lite plans. The first paid plan is marked, so the boundary sits above it rather than at it. As of 2026-09-22.

A boundary drawn by naming the plans below itThe page names the two plans whose videos carry the mark, which places the boundary above the first paid subscription rather than at it. The plans above are not named and no figure is printed for them, so the far side of the boundary is known only by exclusion.Plans, cheapest firstMarkedTrialA full-screenwatermark, witha stated reasonprinted besideit.MarkedLitePaid, and namedin the samesentence as thetrial.CleanAboveNot named, andno figureprinted. Knownby exclusionfrom thatsentence.The boundary is above the first paid plan, not at it
Fig. 1 An invoice cannot distinguish a marked paid plan from an unmarked one. The plan name has to be known.
One cell of the register, and what it rests on. Read from the vendor's pricing page on 2026-09-22.
The readingWhat it holds
The recorded valueStill marked on Lite; clean above it
The vendor's own wordsVideos carry a D-ID watermark on the Trial and Lite plans.
How the reading was takenRead from a sentence naming two plans, which places the boundary above the first paid plan.

Inclusion rule. One row for the value, one for the sentence or absence behind it, one for the method. Nothing here is drawn from output, support replies or coverage by anyone else. Order. Fixed order: the value, then its evidence, then the method.

1Payment is not the boundary, and the page says so

Almost every row in this column can be summarised as free is marked, paid is not. Two rows break that, and this is the one where the vendor states the exception in a sentence rather than leaving it to be read off an icon. Lite is a subscription and its output carries the mark.

For anyone reasoning about contributors that is the most useful sentence on the page. An invoice proves payment and proves nothing about the file, and the difference cannot be recovered later from a billing record. The plan name has to be known, not just the fact of a subscription.

2A stated reason that covers the marked plans

The same page gives a reason for the mark: that there is transparency about the synthetic nature of the videos users generate. Read beside the plan boundary, that argument applies to the trial and to Lite and is not extended to the plans above them, which is a seam worth noticing.

The register records the boundary and the reason as separate rows and does not editorialise about the tension between them. What it will say is that a mark justified by disclosure has an argument for surviving a repackaging, which a mark justified by nothing at all does not.

3Where the mark stops, and what is unpublished about it

The page places the mark on two named plans, so the boundary is above Lite. It does not print a figure for the plan where the mark stops, which puts this row with the two that name a direction without a price, for a different reason: here the unpriced thing is the far side of a boundary drawn by naming the near side.

The trial mark is described as full-screen, which is the only geometry published anywhere in this register. Nothing says whether the mark on Lite is the same object. Two plans share a sentence; only one of them has its mark described.

4Sources

  • Paid tier
    Videos carry a D-ID watermark on the Trial and Lite plans, so the first paid plan is still markedmarked one plan above freeD-ID, pricing / recorded 2026-09-22
  • Free tier
    A full-screen watermark appears for trial usersstated outrightD-ID, pricing / recorded 2026-09-22

The value above is read from d-id.com, the vendor's pricing page, on 2026-09-22. The whole row for this generator is on its own page, and the rule for what this column may hold is on the paid tier column page. Neighbouring readings: Pictory, paid tier, SceneMixer, control.