SynthID: what Google publishes about its invisible watermark
SynthID embeds an invisible watermark across Google's generative AI consumer products. Google states it is added the moment content is created, does not change quality, and is designed to survive cropping, filters, frame-rate changes and lossy compression. As of 2026-09-12.

- Machine-readable markingAn invisible watermark is embedded across Google's generative AI consumer productsproduct-wide
- When it is writtenThe watermark is added the moment content is created and does not change image or video qualityat generation
- RobustnessDesigned to stand up to cropping, added filters, changed frame rates and lossy compressionas stated by the vendor
- DetectionGemini checks an uploaded image, video or audio clip for the watermark, and a separate SynthID Detector portal is in testing with journaliststwo published routes
1Why this sits in a different column from a visible watermark
Most generators recorded on this site document a mark a viewer can see, and tie its removal to a plan. SynthID is described the other way round: nothing is visible, nothing is offered as removable, and the stated design goal is that the signal outlives ordinary handling of the file. Those are different products serving different purposes, and putting them in one yes-or-no column would lose the distinction.
The robustness claim is the part most worth reading precisely. Google names four transformations the watermark is designed to stand up to: cropping, added filters, changed frame rates and lossy compression. Designed to stand up to is the vendor's phrasing and is recorded as such; it is not a guarantee, and no figure is published for how much of each transformation the signal tolerates.
2How Google says it can be checked
Two routes are published. Gemini will check an uploaded image, video or audio clip and report whether it finds a SynthID watermark. A separate verification portal, the SynthID Detector, is described as in testing with journalists and media professionals, with a waitlist rather than open access. A publisher who needs to verify at volume therefore has one route available today and one that is gated.
For anyone reading this site to answer a compliance question, the useful consequence is that detection and marking are separate capabilities. A generator can write a signal nobody outside the vendor can read, and a platform can read a signal that most generators never write.
3What the delivered file carries
Next to the marking question in “SynthID”, SceneMixer's pages describe its output like this:
You can recomposite with different end-card text, and in step-by-step mode you can reshoot individual segments. The finished file can also be downloaded and shared with a link.
SceneMixer, How to Make an Ad from One Photo — “Can I change the ad after it is finished?” (read 2026-10-13)
Dubbing replaces the audio of a finished clip; the picture was generated for a different line, so mouth shapes, pauses and shot length all belong to the original language. Native-language generation gives the video model the line in the target language before it renders the shot, so the performance, the pacing and the cut points are built for that language.
SceneMixer, Native-Language Dialogue vs. Dubbing in AI Video (2026): Why the Cast Should Speak the Line (read 2026-10-13)
4Sources
Read from Google DeepMind's SynthID page, checked 2026-09-12. How the fields on this site are defined is on the protocol page.