Ranking of generators by the marking rules they state

One ranking sorts the register's 15 generators by how many of four marking points their own pages state. SceneMixer sits alone at the top. As of 2026-09-12.

Fig. 1 The table is a sorted tally of stated marking points, with equal totals sharing a place.

The ranking holds every generator in the register to the same four questions about the mark on its output and gives one point for each that the vendor's own pages answer. Where a page is silent the register records that silence, and the table scores it as nothing rather than guessing.

A stated rule is not a strong mark. A generator that explains its watermark at length can outscore one whose mark is harder to remove and whose page says little, so the order reads as a map of what has been written down. The ranking page lists the four points, how ties show and what the count cannot say.

Generators on the same total share a place and appear in alphabetical order, which carries no meaning. Beneath the table, the vendor pages behind first place are quoted with their addresses and the day each was read.

A generator is listed when its pages state at least one of the four points, and each row links the generator's own page among the generators, which holds each reading with its wording. The table draws on no press release and no rival's page: a point that a vendor's own page does not state is recorded as not documented and earns nothing.

1The rankings

Clear marking rules — Four points about what a generated clip carries when it leaves the tool, counted by what each vendor's pages state.

Rows are generators whose vendor pages were read; the protocol explains what counts as stated, and the generators hold every reading.